Screener
Pick a ready-made screen below. Custom pillar minimums are a subscriber feature.
Browse every scored company →
Value & profitability metrics
Filtered directly on PE and ROE — the two most commonly quoted starting points for judging price and efficiency. PE tells you what the market is charging for a rupee of profit; ROE tells you how efficiently that profit is generated in the first place. Neither number means much read alone, which is exactly why these screens exist as a fast first pass, not a final answer.
By size
Nifty 50, Nifty Next 50, midcap and smallcap tiers — size shapes stability, liquidity, and how much room is realistically left to grow. Larger companies tend to be more closely followed and more heavily traded; smaller ones are often less analyzed, which can mean either genuine opportunity or genuine reason for caution depending on the specific business. Comparing across tiers is one of the simplest ways to see how much size itself explains about a company's numbers.
Business stage
Where a company sits in its own life cycle — Growth, Stable, Mature, Turnaround, Emerging or Cyclical — which changes how every other number on its page should be read. A modest Profitability score means something different for a company in Turnaround than for one classified Stable, and a weak year for a Cyclical business often just reflects where the broader cycle currently sits. Screening by stage is a quick way to find companies that fit the specific kind of exposure you're actually looking for.
How sure are we about the data
Confidence reflects how much financial history backs a score — a newer listing carries less certainty than a decade of filings. This isn't a judgment on the company itself, only on how much track record currently exists to support the number shown. A High-confidence score and a Low-confidence score of the same value are not equally trustworthy, and these screens make that distinction explicit rather than leaving it hidden.
Ownership & structure
Government-owned and non-cyclical companies tend to behave differently through a downturn than the broader market. PSU companies often carry different governance and capital allocation dynamics than private peers, while non-cyclical businesses are less exposed to swings in a broader commodity or industry cycle. Combining both filters surfaces a genuinely narrower, more defensive slice of the market.
Track record & reliability
Longer histories and reasonable-quality earnings, for screens that favor consistency over a single strong year. A company with ten years of steady, unremarkable results is a fundamentally different proposition than one with two exceptional years and no track record before that. These screens are built specifically for investors who weight durability more heavily than a flashy recent number.
Popular screens
Combinations of several pillars at once — the screens most people actually reach for first. Each one blends two or three criteria that tend to matter together in practice, like low debt paired with genuine growth, rather than asking you to build that combination yourself from scratch. A good starting point if you're not yet sure exactly which single metric to filter on.
Sector shortcuts
Banking and financial stocks specifically, matched by sector text rather than a fixed index list. This sector is conventionally valued differently from the rest of the market — PB tends to matter more than PE, and debt ratios mean something structurally different for a lender than for an ordinary operating company. These shortcuts exist because banking is asked about often enough to deserve its own dedicated screens.
Nifty 50 screens by pillar
Every major pillar, scoped to just the 50 largest, most-tracked companies on the exchange. These are the names with the deepest analyst coverage and the most liquidity, so a strong score here is being checked against genuinely stiff competition, not a thin or obscure universe. Useful for anyone who specifically wants exposure limited to the most established, widely held companies in the market.
Midcap & smallcap screens by pillar
The same pillar-based screens, run one tier down — often where more room to grow, and more risk, both live. These companies typically carry less analyst coverage than large caps, which can mean genuine opportunities go unnoticed for longer, but also means less independent scrutiny has already been applied to their numbers. Worth treating a strong score here as a starting point for deeper reading, not a finished conclusion.
Inspired by classic strategies
Approximations of well-known screening frameworks, adapted to the data this site actually stores — see each chip for exactly how close. The original Coffee Can and Piotroski tests each specify precise, multi-year criteria that not every dataset can fully reproduce; where the data genuinely supports the real test, that's labelled plainly, and where it doesn't, the approximation is labelled just as plainly rather than presented as the real thing.
Profitability screens
Decent (50+), strong (70+), and excellent (85+) Profitability scores, so the full range is visible in one place. Moving up through these three tiers shows how much of the market clears each successive bar, which is often a more useful reference point than judging any single company's score in isolation. The same three-tier pattern repeats across every pillar below for exactly this reason.
Debt Safety screens
Decent (50+), strong (70+), and excellent (85+) Debt Safety scores, at increasing levels of balance-sheet comfort. A company clearing only the decent bar still deserves the same interest-coverage and cash-flow check as one much closer to excellent — these tiers group companies by score, not by how much scrutiny they still warrant.
Earnings Quality screens
Decent (50+), strong (70+), and excellent (85+) Earnings Quality scores — how much reported profit is genuinely backed by cash. A company can look impressive on Growth or Profitability while scoring only decently here, which is often the first visible sign that a strong headline number deserves a closer look before being taken at face value.
Growth screens
Decent (50+), strong (70+), and excellent (85+) Growth scores, measured against each company's own sector. A growth rate that looks unremarkable in absolute terms can still be excellent relative to a slow-moving sector, and a rate that sounds impressive can be merely decent in a sector where that pace is typical — these tiers already account for that sector context.
Valuation screens
Decent (50+), strong (65+), and excellent (85+) Valuation scores — remember a higher score here means a cheaper price, not a better business. An excellent Valuation score paired with a weak Quality score is precisely the value-trap pattern worth checking for before treating any of these as an automatic bargain.
Growth Potential Screens
Decent (50+), strong (70+), and excellent (85+) Opportunity scores — room left to grow, not growth already delivered. This is the one forward-looking pillar among the six, so a strong score here is a statement about conditions favorable to future growth, not a guarantee that growth will actually materialize.
Dividend & book value
Dividend yield and PB thresholds — useful for income-focused screening, though a high yield always deserves a sustainability check. A yield inflated by a falling share price looks identical to a genuinely generous, well-covered payout until you check free cash flow specifically — these screens surface the candidates, the coverage check is still worth doing separately.
Ownership screens
FII and promoter holding levels — a snapshot in time, not a trend, since only today's value is stored. A high promoter holding is often read as a sign of confidence, and rising FII interest as a sign of institutional conviction, but neither figure here shows direction of change, only where the number currently stands.
Price & momentum
The only screens on this site based on price action rather than fundamentals — labelled plainly as exactly that. Everything else here measures the underlying business; these specifically measure how the share price has been moving, which is a genuinely different kind of signal and is kept clearly separate rather than blended into the fundamentals-based screens above.
Company trends
Built from year-by-year financial history — capacity expansion, debt reduction, and growth without shareholder dilution. These look at direction of change across several years rather than a single snapshot, which is exactly the kind of multi-year pattern a one-time PE or ROE check can't show on its own.
Beginner-friendly
A gentler starting point — large, well-known companies with fewer moving parts to evaluate at once. These combine size, stability and data confidence specifically to surface names that are easier to research fully, not necessarily the highest-scoring companies on the site overall.